| Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Speedrye Trail Guide
Posts : 1050 Points : 6039 Join date : 2011-08-30 Location : Stokesdale, NC
| Subject: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:17 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
bigdogdewey2 ADMINISTRATOR
Posts : 3697 Points : 8683 Join date : 2011-08-30 Age : 56 Location : High Point, NC
| Subject: Re: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:25 am | |
| nice pics...wish i could get off in the middle of the week and go play!! lol | |
|
| |
fjdarrell Tail Gunner
Posts : 743 Points : 5492 Join date : 2012-01-01 Age : 42 Location : j-ville
| Subject: Re: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:28 am | |
| i think i need the body lift, your rig looks sic, and it seems like those 35's fit alot better with it... | |
|
| |
NC FJ Driver Gunner
Posts : 1551 Points : 6498 Join date : 2011-05-09 Age : 61 Location : Raeford, NC
| Subject: Re: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:40 am | |
| Nice pics, great looking ride! | |
|
| |
MadToy SUPPORTING MEMBER
Posts : 1571 Points : 6317 Join date : 2012-02-14 Age : 55 Location : Huntersville, NC
| Subject: Re: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:09 am | |
| Very nice pics!
How do the Falken 315's measure in height compared to the Kumho 315's?
The Wildpeaks have 3 ply sidewalls, which is also why they need to be aired down more for deflection. | |
|
| |
SingleTrack Trail Scout
Posts : 267 Points : 4683 Join date : 2012-11-25 Age : 47 Location : Greensboro, NC
| Subject: Re: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:36 am | |
| Man, that just looks nasty. Great shots! | |
|
| |
Speedrye Trail Guide
Posts : 1050 Points : 6039 Join date : 2011-08-30 Location : Stokesdale, NC
| Subject: Re: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:39 am | |
| The Falkens are a little shorter at 34.4" vs the Kumho's 34.6"
The Falken's did very well in the rocks and were very impressive for an AT tire! If I weren't in deep mud often, I'd try these on the FJ for my next set, but they simply don't have enough traction in those situations from what I've seen. | |
|
| |
MadToy SUPPORTING MEMBER
Posts : 1571 Points : 6317 Join date : 2012-02-14 Age : 55 Location : Huntersville, NC
| Subject: Re: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:00 pm | |
| - Speedrye wrote:
- The Falkens are a little shorter at 34.4" vs the Kumho's 34.6"
The Falken's did very well in the rocks and were very impressive for an AT tire! If I weren't in deep mud often, I'd try these on the FJ for my next set, but they simply don't have enough traction in those situations from what I've seen. I've been very impressed with the Falkens so far. I hate mud, so I'm not concerned about how they do in the deep stuff, but more that they can get me through it when I need to if I don't have a choice. They are excellent in the rocks though. I'm wanting to move up to the 315's, but heard they run short, so curious if these actually look like 35's or 33's. | |
|
| |
Speedrye Trail Guide
Posts : 1050 Points : 6039 Join date : 2011-08-30 Location : Stokesdale, NC
| Subject: Re: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:18 pm | |
| It's hard to tell. They look very large on a TJ, and they're barely smaller than mine and mine look quite big on an FJ, so I think you'd be okay.
I hate mud as well, but if I'm out on a 50-acre jobsite after a rainy spell, I don't have much of a choice. | |
|
| |
MadToy SUPPORTING MEMBER
Posts : 1571 Points : 6317 Join date : 2012-02-14 Age : 55 Location : Huntersville, NC
| Subject: Re: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:41 pm | |
| Good to know. Definitely love these Falkens so far. Only negative is they are HEAVY. But they're near dead silent on the highway | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride | |
| |
|
| |
| Uwharrie Tuesday 12/11 ride | |
|